Powertionism in International Criminal Justice

Powertionism is an innovative legal term coined by the author used to emphasize the greed of our governments. This greed is demonstrated through how such governments interpret international legal rules based on their agendas and their desire to pursue and strengthen their political, military, and economic interests. As a result, certain governments have adopted hypocritical, autocratic, egregious, and reductio ad absurdum standards, while other governments continue to suffer under the hegemonic policies of the former. Powertionism sings a song of superiority instead of one of multilateralism. The epidemic of powertionism first arose within the systems of international human rights law and international criminal justice when governments nominated themselves to be permanent members of the United Nations, Security Council, and NATO, and subsequently began imposing hypocritical sanctions upon other states. The existence of a number of brutal wars in different regions implies the expansion of hedonistic powertionism which has spawned from the concealed and cruel political interests at the national and international levels. The deceitful justification of the notion of powertionism prevents populations across the globe from attaining their substantive cultural, ethnic, and universal natural rights. This book illuminates the truth relating to the objectives of governments working to conceal the true nature and impact of their deadly weapons as a result of the punitive or deluded decisions made by NATO or others. We are compelled to promote accurate values of human rights in order to prevent large-scale massacres resulting from powertionist, oppressive, and unilateral judgments. We can no longer ethically consent to the domination of power, the waging of proxy wars, and the ambiguous incitement of the commission of international crimes by permitting the chauvinistic policies of powertionist governments.