Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Alterity and Criticism: Tracing Time in Modern Literature

How does the theme of the other--as person, experience or alternative conceptual scheme-allow us to reassess the role of the self in literary texts? This book employs phenomenology and semiotics to argue that modern literature is strongly concerned with the role of time in the construction of the self. Alterity and Criticism: Retracing Time in Modern Literature argues that the role of time in canonical literature underlies the experience of alterity and requires a new hermeneutic to clarify how the self emerges in literary texts. Romantic poetry from Goethe to Shelley and the modern prose tradition from Flaubert to Butor constitute different traditions but also indicate, on a textual basis, how alterity performs a crucial role in reading, thus encouraging us to interpret literary texts in terms of the related concerns of self, other and time. The author examines the phenomenology of Emmanuel Lévinas and Wolfgang Iser, as well as the cultural semiotics of Julia Kristeva, to argue that modern literature provides the occasion for a new understanding of the self in time and, in this way, addresses some of the pressing literary problems of our own period. Review Melaney intricately connects the dissolution of subject-centered consciousness, interrupted by alterity as audaciously expressed in modern literature, to reflections of phenomenology, semiotics, hermeneutics, and psychoanalysis. He highlights broken circuits of reflexivity as key to reading in the mode that in the modern period gives us literature - provocatively presented as a creation of criticism.--William Franke, Vanderbilt University Melaney's book is a welcome addition to ethical criticism because it eschews the danger of merely stating the alterity of the Other. The strength of Melaney is his philosophical rigor allied with an attention to textual detail, historical context, and theoretical conversations that illuminate the texts discussed, from Goethe to Joyce, from the Romantics to Eliot and Butor. Alterity appears here less as a recurrent theme than as a question posed to literature so as to prevent semiotic closure: texts are shown to be irreducibly open to the time of the Other.--Jean-Michel Rabaté, Professor of English and Comparative Literature at the University of Pennsylvania About the Author William D. Melaney is Professor in the Department of English and Comparative Literature at the American University in Cairo. His research is interdisciplinary and embraces philosophy, literary studies, aesthetics and social thought. He has previously published numerous articles and three books on Continental philosophy and the problem of cultural modernity.