Gospels, Epistles, Old Testament: The order of books according to Jesus Chri st

The various uses of Jesus, Christ, Jesus Christ and Christ Jesus raise the question of the exact context in which each is used, and which one(s) came prior to the other(s). A close study of the earliest Christian manuscripts, however, shows that they don't contain a Jesus or Christ at all, only the short forms ΙΣ and ΧΣ (and as such, also ΙΣ ΧΣ as well as ΧΣ ΙΣ). Neither is explained what these mean, and when they are assumed to be an abbreviation, there is more than merely one possibility; while there is one word assumed to be the word of choice, there is also another one that is almost identical. A thorough and extensive statistical analysis of all the books of the Bible will answer the question: what does that mysterious ΧΣ stand for, χριστός or χρηστός? The first word means 'anointed' in Greek, the second means 'good', and it is widely assumed that Jesus Christ is the Anointed - yet even that word does not appear anywhere in the New Testament, neither in the Epistles nor in the Gospels. Most surprisingly however, the word exists in great abundance in the Old Testament. While it is unanimously assumed, by laymen as well as scholars, that the chronological order of writings consists of the Old Testament, followed by the New Testament, such would certainly suggest that the order is the exact opposite. The same statistical analysis also reveals most surprising finds in the Epistles, which in turn initiate an entirely new search, that evolves and unfolds entirely in Egypt - where the true origins of this mysterious ΧΣ are found: a largely spiritual movement that was about a Good Jesus, a χρηστός ΙΣ. Not only is the Christian Bible subjected to close scrutiny, but the findings are also compared with and verified against the oldest and earliest manuscripts such as Codex Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus and Vaticanus, as well as individual and fragmentary papyri. The earliest Patristics are called to the stand, e.g. Justin Martyr, Tertullian and Clement of Alexandria, and also less subjective witnesses such as the Roman historians Tacitus and Suetonius. Last and most certainly not least, all of the Nag Hammadi Library is unearthed - again - and deeply buried secrets are brought to light. This all-embracing book upsets many centuries of Bible studies: on the basis of concisely summarized research results that are presented in a transparent manner, possible solutions are offered for the repeatedly surprising and unexpected facts, the most plausible conclusion of which consistently points in a direction that is strongly at odds with the dogma of the Church. The Christian source texts themselves, the so-called Church Fathers and the so-called apocryphal writings all confirm the shocking conclusion: Jesus Christ, the Anointed, the Messiah, has no original existence whatsoever, and that carefully fabricated concept dates from centuries later. All of Christianity started out as a counter reaction to Chrestianity, and it was an organised move, orchestrated by Roman rulers. The entire trajectory from beginning to end is laid out, from the very first source text to the very last Christian texts, including dating, motivating why one text was created in response to another, and providing compelling explanations for e.g. the baptism of Jesus, the Messianic Secret, and the rejection of Judaic law and customs by the alleged Judaic Messiah ΙΣ ΧΣ.