Accelerating Expansion of the Universe – the Reasonable Alternative: Analysis Based on the Logic of Astronomical Observations, Astronomical ... (On the True Nature of Things in Physics)

The monograph touches on the eternal theme that has been exciting to mankind for centuries – about the future of the Universe, about the time, space, and the embedded energy in the fabric of space of the Universe. The root causes of the emergence and existence of the problem “accelerating expansion of the Universe” are presented. The accelerating expansion of the Universe is undoubtedly a problem in physics because it is illogical for the Universe to expand, despite the existing and undeniably proven universal attraction (Newton’s law of universal gravitation). Modern physics tries to explain the delusion of the „accelerating expansion of the Universe” by the myth of the “dark energy” (whose nature is inexplicable even for the modern cosmologists themselves), as well as by the presence of an illogically high percentage of some unknown kind of “dark matter” in the Universe. Vesto Melvin Slipher is the American astronomer who was the first who reports on the observed shift of spectral lines of electromagnetic radiation (of light) coming from distant galaxies. Slipher’s assumption that the observed redshift “as if caused by velocity, maybe is due to some other reason”, remains valid for modern physics up to now, although, according to Edwin Hubble, the redshift “represents a hitherto unrecognized principle of nature”. The acceptance of the assumption that the “redshift” is due to velocity (due to the unproven claim that the Doppler Effect exists at the electromagnetic waves), is actually a brilliant example of how an unproven assumption is perceived as scientific truth without any experimental evidence! The real explanation of the incorrectly called “Doppler radar” with Schrödinger’s dynamic interpretation is presented in the monograph too, as well as irrefutable counterarguments for the existence of the Doppler Effect at the electromagnetic waves. In fact, the scientific contribution of this monograph is that a genuine explanation (the other cause) of the observed redshift of the spectral lines of electromagnetic radiation coming from distant galaxies is presented, based on the deduced “energy-spatial relationship”. This explanation is in full accordance with Newton’s law of universal gravitation, with the astronomical observations, as well as is evidenced by the three dimensions mapping of a vast part of the Universe, and by the analysis of the motion of an impressive number of galaxies by the team of the American astronomer Sandra Faber. Another scientific contribution of this monograph is that indisputably becomes clear, that all these “scientific” hypotheses about existing a “dark energy” and a “dark matter” are superfluous make-believes which should no longer be supported by modern physics! In this sense is the conclusion of Professor Karl Popper that in modern physics “a theory must be falsifiable to be scientific”! The given final conclusion is that the observed “redshift” actually indicates that the Universe is in a stage of “accelerating contraction”, which is actually proven by the team of the American astronomer Sandra Faber. This is the undeniable argument that the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics should have been awarded to Professor Sandra Faber and her colleagues: “for the discoveries proving that the Universe is at a contracting stage towards the region of global attraction of the Universe (called "the Great Attractor") and that this contraction is accelerating due to the increase in the incoming matter in that region of the global attraction, and due to the decrease in the distance of the moving galaxies towards this region”.