Brill Best Practices for Human Rights and Humanitarian NGO Fact-Finding: 78 (Nijhoff Law Specials, 78)

This work outlines available resources and proposed standards for international NGO fact-finding missions: Chapter One presents an introduction to the issue of NGO fact-finding. Chapter Two discusses the problems caused by the lack of any generally-accepted guidelines for NGO fact-finding, in contrast with contexts where NGOs have achieved consensus. Chapter Three surveys proposed guidelines for human rights and humanitarian NGOs. In addition, this section examines United Nations fact-finding standards, as well as examples of internal fact-finding standards for major NGOs. Chapter Four analyzes the fact-finding standards used in five specific cases: the International Crisis Group (Kosovo, 1999), the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia (Georgia, 2008), United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Mapping Exercise on the Democratic Republic of Congo (1993-2003), Conflict Analysis Resource Center/University London study on Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch (Colombia, 1988-2004), and Human Rights Watch (Lebanon, 2006). The final chapter offers conclusions and recommendations. About the Author Gerald Steinberg is president of NGO Monitor and professor of Political Studies at Bar Ilan University. His research interests include international relations, Middle East diplomacy and security, the politics of human rights and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), Israeli politics, and arms control. Steinberg works with a number of international organizations (NATO, UN University, OSCE, SIPRI); participates in track-two workshops and in the Inter-parliamentary Coalition for Combating Antisemitism (ICCA); and is the founder of the Program on Conflict Management and Negotiation at Bar Ilan University. His op-ed columns have been published in the Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, Ha'aretz, International Herald Tribune, Jerusalem Post, and other publications. Recent academic publications include "The Politics of NGOs, Human Rights and the Arab-Israeli Conflict" (Israel Studies); "Realism, Politics and Culture in Middle East Arms Control Negotiations" (International Negotiation); and "The UN, the ICJ and the Separation Barrier: War by Other Means" (Israel Law Review). Anne Herzberg is the Legal Advisor of NGO Monitor. Her areas of expertise include international human rights and humanitarian law, NGOs and the UN system, universal jurisdiction, and international criminal law. She is a graduate of Oberlin College and Columbia University Law School, where she was named a James Kent Scholar and a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar. She also served as the Managing Editor for the Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Prior to joining NGO Monitor, Anne worked as a litigation associate in New York. As part of her pro bono work as an associate, she assisted asylum seekers and performed work for the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Her publications have appeared in major news outlets including the Wall Street Journal (Europe), Ha'aretz, Jerusalem Post, YNet, and Jewish Ideas Daily. She is the author of NGO 'Lawfare' Exploitation of Courts in the Arab-Israeli Conflict, co-editor of The Goldstone Report "Reconsidered": A Critical Analysis, and has also published on the International Criminal Tribunal for Yugoslavia ("Rule 61: The Voice of the Victims Screams Out for Justice") in the Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Jordan Berman received a J.D. from UCLA School of Law in 2008 and a B.A. from Brandeis University in 2003. He is a licensed attorney in the state of Illinois, where he worked for two years as a Staff Law Clerk for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. During law school, he served as Managing Editor of the UCLA Law Review, which published his 2007 article, "The Presumption of Sanity and Clark's Categorization of Mens Rea Evidence." He also worked as the Legal Research Assistant to the Chancellor of UCLA, as a Law Clerk for