De Gruyter Verhandlungen Des Vierundzwanzigsten Deutschen Juristentages - Gutachten: 24 (Verhandlungen Des Deutschen Juristentages)

Frontmatter -- Table of Contents -- Expert Report (First Volume.) -- I. Did the Professor Dr. Georg Frommhold in Hreifswald about the question: How to shape the property rights and other legal relationships in pension and settlement goods? -- II. Expert opinion of Professor Dr. Ehrenberg in Göttingen on the question: What position is to be granted to the insurance companies on reciprocity in the expected insurance law? -- III. Expert opinion of the Reichsgerichtsrath Dr. Stenglein in Leipzig on the question: The treatment of dolus eventualis in criminal law and criminal process -- IV. Expert opinion of Professor Dr. Franz von Liszt in Hall a. S. about the question: The treatment of dolus eventualis in criminal law and criminal trial -- V. Expert opinion of the Mr. Amtsrichter and Professor Dr. Eonrad Bornhak in Berlin on the question: A silch of deportation to the colonies is recommended as punishment -- VI. Expert opinion of Dr. Hugo Neumann, lawyer at the Chamber Court in Berlin on the question: According to which local rights are to be assessed on the basis of international private law the contract obligations -- Front matter 2 -- Content 2 -- Expert opinion (second volume.) -- VII. Expert opinion of the local judge and Prof. Dr. jur. Conrad Bornhak in Berlin on the question: recommends the proposal of conditional pardon for the case of emigration -- VIII. Expert opinion of Professor Max Weber in Heidelberg on the question: the introduction of a home law is recommended, especially for the protection of small property, against foreclosure -- IX. Expert opinion of Professor Dr. W. v. Seeler on Kiev on the question: According to which local rights are to be assessed on the basis of international private law the contract obligations -- X. Expert opinion of the Government Council Dr. Fritz Freund on Coblenz on the question: "An attempt of deportation to the colonies is recommended as a punishment. and "recerecep" and Is the suggestion of conditional pardon for the case of emigration?" -- XI Expert opinion of Professor Lammasch in Vienna on the question: Should the mere expiry of a legally determined period since the criminal act be sufficient for the limitation of prosecution? or should this limitation be linked to other conditions -- XII. Expert opinion of Dr. Friedrich Tezner on Vienna on the question: Is a legal regulation of the business of the basic and mortgage brokers? and on what basis -- XIII. Expert opinion of the Deputy Public Prosecutor Dr. Hugo Hoegel in Vienna on the question: Should the mere expiry of a legally determined time since the criminal proceedings be sufficient for the limitation of prosecution? or should this limitation be tied to other conditions -- XIV. Expert opinion of the lawyer Emil Koffka in Berlin on the question: Is the provision of § 296 of the Civil Procedure Regulation for the German Reich, by which the judge must ignore in the creation of the default judgment against a party stayed away in the last appointment. Everything that they must ignore in earlier appointments. Determination of § 399 of the Austrian Civil Process Regulation, which in this case does not accept complete neglect, internally justified -- XV. Expert opinion of the Justice Rath Dr. Eckels from Göttingen on the question: In order to eliminate the maladministrations in the construction industry, it is recommended to grant construction craftsmen a preferred mortgage on the vau property due to their claims against the builders or to subject the builders to police controls to be exercised by a communal authority. Expert opinion of the private docent Dr. Hans Sperl in Graz on the question: Is the provision of § 296 of the Civil Procedure Regulation for the German Reich, by which the judges in the creation of the default judgment against one of the last T