De Gruyter Verhandlungen Des Zweiundzwanzigsten Deutschen Juristentages - Gutachten: 22 (Verhandlungen Des Deutschen Juristentages)

Frontmatter -- Table of Contents -- I. Powers of Mr. Prof, «frtjrn. o. Canstein in Hraz on the question: is the oath deferral in the Civil Process to be replaced by the interrogation of the parties as witnesses? -- II. Expert opinion of the Lord yrioatöocenten Dr. Heorg Ztteinfetter to Munich on the question: Is the oath deferral in the Civil Procefse to be replaced by the interrogation of the parties as witnesses? -- III. Power of the Mr. Neichsgerichtsrath St eng zu Leipzig on the question: the implementation of the system of the Schöffgerichte is recommended through the collective first instance criminal court constitution. -- IV. Did he make Mr. Hofrath Dr. Fetix Hecht, soft birectors in Mannheim about the question: have the Cautelen created by the active novel of July 18, 1884 proven themselves against unsolid foundations of active companies or is it recommended to design them otherwise? -- V. Machten öes Herrn Oustizrath 311. Levy to Bersin on the question: have the Cautelen created by the active novelle of July 18, 1884 proven themselves against unsolid foundations, or is it recommended to design them otherwise? -- VI Does the Mr. Amtsrichter ckatkmann zu Liegnitz about the question: Is a fundamental increase in the existing restrictions on enforcement recommended, for example in the direction of a general competence asset? -- VII. Power of the army Agency Genchlsrath Iastrow to Rerkn about the question: How is the abuses that have emerged in the payment transactions to counteract the abuses? -- VIII. Machten des Herrn Landrichter Dove zu Frankfurt a. 3H. On the question: In contrast to the draft Civil Code, it is recommended to adhere to the principle of formlessness of the contracts in relation to certain contracts, e.g. B. the guarantee? -- IX Do Des Zerrn lawyer Dr. Zelpcke make learning about the question: Is the application of the term of force majeure recommended in civil law? -- X Does Mr. Iustizrath Lesse make Vertin on the question: Is a special legislative regulation of the so-called bank deposit transactions recommended and a special of their different types? -- XI Does Mr. Rechtsanmatt Dr. Julian Holdschmidt to Lerlin about the question: Is a special legislative regulation of the so-called bank custody transactions recommended and a special feature of their different types? -- XII Did the Prof. Dr. "Franz Mein zu Vienna about the question: Are the types of lien on property including the basic debt provided for in the draft civil code to be retained? -- XIII. Did the Lord Reichsgerichtsrath Loekett zu Leipzig over the question: Are the types of lien on property including the basic debt provided for in the draft of the bourgeois law to be retained? *) -- XIV. Did Professor Dr. E. Altmann have made to Munich about the question: What procedure would be recommended if the legislation grants innocent convicts a claim to compensation for the same? -- Front matter 2 -- Table of contents -- XV. Did Professor Dr. Reinhard Frank turn to Hießen about the question: Is it recommended to implement the system of the Schöffgerichte on the entire first-instance criminal court constitution? -- XVI Did the District Judge Fr. Nansen to Rostock on the question: Is it recommended to increase the existing restrictions on enforcement in the direction of a general competence asset? -- XVII Did Professor Dr. Josef von 8chey made Hrazabout the question: Is the application of the term of force majeure recommended in civil law? -- XVIII Machten bes Herrn Prof. Dr. Kars von Lilienthat zu Marburg i jH. About the question: If changes to the applicable law are desired in relation to the relationship between money