Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: Comparative Perspectives: 39 (Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 39) - Image 1

£145.42

Springer Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: Comparative Perspectives: 39 (Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 39)

Name: Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: Comparative Perspectives: 39 (Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 39)
Brand: Springer
Price: 145.42 GBP
Availability: InStock

International

It has never been this cheap. We have no record of a lower price.

£145 today · cheaper than every other day in the last 3 months

NEW HERE?

Amazon shows you one price. We show you all of them.

Tosheroon watches Amazon prices so you don't have to. Every product on Amazon has a price history — we make it visible. Set the price you'd actually pay, and we'll email you the second it gets there. No app, no account, one email.

WHAT'S ON THIS PAGE

↓ Price chart
when this has been cheap or pricey

↓ Forecast
where the price is heading next

↓ Statistics
all-time high & low, recent range

↑ Price alert
name your number, we'll email you

Price History & Forecast

Grey patches = out of stock. Cheaper = lower on the chart. Hover for exact prices.

Last 41 days · 41 data points (no recent data)

Historical

Generating forecast…

Price Distribution

Price distribution over 41 days • 2 price levels

Days at Price

Current Price

Price Analysis

Most common price: £149 (31 days, 75.6%)

Price range: £145 - £149

Price levels: 2 different prices over 41 days

Description

This book investigates judicial deference to the administration in judicial review, a concept and legal practice that can be found to a greater or lesser degree in every constitutional system. In each system, deference functions differently, because the positioning of the judiciary with regard to the separation of powers, the role of the courts as a mechanism of checks and balances, and the scope of judicial review differ. In addition, the way deference works within the constitutional system itself is complex, multi-faceted and often covert. Although judicial deference to the administration is a topical theme in comparative administrative law, a general examination of national systems is still lacking. As such, a theoretical and empirical review is called for. Accordingly, this book presents national reports from 15 jurisdictions, ranging from Argentina, Canada and the US, to the EU. Constituting the outcome of the 20th General Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, held in Fukuoka, Japan in July 2018, it offers a valuable and unique resource for the study of comparative administrative law.

Product Specifications

Brand: Springer
Format: paperback
ASIN: 303031541X
Category: Books > Subjects > Business, Finance & Law > Law > International
Domain: Amazon UK
Release Date: 24 November 2020
Listed Since: 28 October 2020

Barcode

No barcode data available

Springer Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: Comparative Perspectives: 39 (Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 39)

It has never been this cheap. We have no record of a lower price.

Price History & Forecast

Price Distribution

Price Analysis

Description

Product Specifications

Barcode

Similar Products You Might Like

Current Issues of Comparative Law – Questions actuelles de droit comparé: General Contributions of 2018 Fukuoka Congress – Contributions générales du ... - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 35)

Fair Reflection of Society in Judicial Systems - A Comparative Study: 7 (Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 7)

Rule of Law, Human Rights and Judicial Control of Power: Some Reflections from National and International Law: 61 (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 61)

Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights: Critical Comparative Analysis of Constitutional Review in the United States, Germany and Mexico

Comparing the Prospective Effect of Judicial Rulings Across Jurisdictions: 3 (Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 3)

Judicial Review of Legislation: A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and South Africa: 5 (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 5)

Democratizing Constitutional Law: Perspectives on Legal Theory and the Legitimacy of Constitutionalism: 113 (Law and Philosophy Library, 113)

Codification in International Perspective: Selected Papers from the 2nd IACL Thematic Conference: 1 (Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 1)

The Legal Doctrines of the Rule of Law and the Legal State (Rechtsstaat): 38 (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 38)

The Politico-Legal Dynamics of Judicial Review: A Comparative Analysis (Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy)

Problems of International Administrative Law: On the Occasion of the Twentieth Anniversary of the World Bank Administrative Tribunal

Judges Against Justice: On Judges When the Rule of Law is Under Attack

Controlling Administrative Power: An Historical Comparison

Judicial Activism: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the American and European Experiences: 44 (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 44)

Proportionality in Law: An Analytical Perspective

The Indian Yearbook of Comparative Law 2018

Exclusionary Rules in Comparative Law: 20 (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 20)

Controlling Administrative Power: An Historical Comparison

Comparative Constitutional Law: Basic Issues / Structures and Basic Rights / Freedom of Expression and Religion, and Equality (The International Library of Comparative Law series)

Global Perspectives on Subsidiarity: 37 (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 37)

Global Perspectives on Subsidiarity: 37 (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 37)

Developments in Foundation Law in Europe: 39 (Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 39)

Perils of Judicial Self-Government in Transitional Societies (Comparative Constitutional Law and Policy)

Constitutional Law in Japan