Bloomsbury The Legitimacy and Responsiveness of Industry Rule-making

Review While [the book’s] focus is very specific to the telecommunications sector, the theory discussed and the very practical nature of many of her findings are, I believe, relevant to many sectors. In this technology driven era we find ourselves in, with the accompanying convergence between sectors and globalisation that is happening and the constant drive for innovation, industry based rule-making is likely to be an important part of the mix for how we regulate our society … It is great to see such intelligent attention applied to this issue. It is an important contribution to debates about how we and our society regulate conduct. ― Delia Rickard, Deputy Chair of the Australian Competition and Consumer CommissionThis volume provides a timely analysis of the potential for industry rule-making at a time when the outcomes of the Hayne Royal Commission suggest that industry rule-making in some sectors has no legitimacy... Karen's work is very readable, and this timely volume will be helpful beyond its target audience. -- Rob Nicholls ― Australian Business Law ReviewThis book is a fascinating contribution to non-traditional law-making. It is highly worthwhile for administrative lawyers to engage with it. If, as is now legal scholarship orthodoxy, we administrative lawyers should study law in context we need informed understandings of the characteristics of the modern state. In my view, that is the primary contribution that Lee makes to our field. It helps us to understand the context in which administrative law operates. Legislative law-making is now multi-layered: authorised by parliamentary legislation, it is commonly influenced by international laws, and is often made by administrative officials. As she shows us, it is now sometimes made by the industry that is to be regulated. -- Andrew Edgar, University of Sydney ― Public Law Product Description Rule-making is no longer an activity undertaken exclusively by public actors. Private actors are increasingly allowed by legislatures and regulatory bodies to take part in (and in some cases assume responsibility for) the formation of legally binding rules, for example in the US, UK, Australia and the EU. Departing from traditional forms of rule-making by involving private actors may enhance the ability of regulatory systems to achieve social goals, as regulatory scholars argue. However, because private actors are permitted to act in their own best interests, their involvement also raises doubts about the legitimacy of the underlying rule-making processes and the rules that are formulated. The principal aim of this book is to highlight that the tension between the responsiveness that leading international regulatory scholars advocate in order to improve regulatory effectiveness, and the law and its formal, substantive, procedural and institutional values, is not as great as may first appear. Drawing on three in-depth case studies of the experience of the Australian telecommunications industry with self-regulatory rule-making - a form of rule-making that bears the hallmarks of `responsive regulation', `democratic experimentalism', `smart regulation' and other strategies of proceduralization - it is argued that industry rule-making can, as a matter of practice, be responsive and legitimate at the same time. In doing so, the book formulates and applies criteria against which industry rule-making should be evaluated and identifies a number of indicia that point to when industry rule-making is likely to be simultaneously legitimate and responsive. About the Author Karen Lee is Lecturer in Law at the University of New England, Australia.