Cambridge University Press Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions (Feminist Judgment Series: Rewritten Judicial Opinions)

Could a feminist perspective change the shape of tax laws? Feminist reasoning and analysis are recognized as having tremendous potential to affect employment discrimination, sexual harassment, and reproductive rights laws - but they can likewise transform tax law (as well as other statutory or code-based areas of the law). By highlighting the importance of perspective, background, and preconceptions on reading and interpreting statutes, this volume shows what a difference feminist analysis can make to statutory interpretation. Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Tax Opinions brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite tax decisions in which a feminist emphasis would have changed the outcome, the court's reasoning, or the future direction of the law. Featuring cases including medical expense deductions for fertility treatment, gender confirmation surgery, tax benefits for married individuals, the tax treatment of tribal lands, and business expense deductions, this volume opens the way for a discussion of how viewpoint is a key factor in statutory interpretation. Review '… the book is a beautiful gift, not only to tax scholars and professionals, but also to women's rights advocates and political actors who aim at fostering substantive gender equality, including as regards taxation.' Alice Pirlot, Literature review Book Description Feminist scholars rewrite major tax decisions in order to illustrate the key role of viewpoint in statutory interpretation. About the Author Bridget J. Crawford is a Professor of Law in the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University, New York.Anthony C. Infanti is a Professor of Law at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law.