Cambridge University Press Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review

Is judicial review an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures? Some argue that the judiciary is ill-equipped to examine such measures, for instance because they lack the expertise of the institutions which bring them about under exigent conditions. Others claim that subjecting counter-terrorism measures to judicial review is crucial for maintaining a jurisdiction's principles of constitutionalism. This volume brings together voices from all sides of the debate from a broad range of jurisdictions, from North America, Europe and Australasia. It does not attempt to 'resolve' the argument but rather to explore it in all its dimensions. The debates are essentially concerned with fundamental questions of organising and making accountable the exercise of power in a particularly challenging environment. The book is necessary reading for all those concerned with counter-terrorism, but also with broader public law, constitutional law and administrative law principles. Book Description An examination of the debates regarding whether judicial review is an effective and appropriate way to regulate counter-terrorism measures. About the Author Fergal F. Davis is a Senior Lecturer in the School of Law at the University of New South Wales, Sydney.Fiona de Londras is a Professor of Law at the University of Durham where she is also Co-Director of Durham Human Rights Centre.