How Courts Impact Federal Administrative Behavior: 3 (Routledge Studies in North American Politics) - Image 1

£96.96

Routledge How Courts Impact Federal Administrative Behavior: 3 (Routledge Studies in North American Politics)

Name: How Courts Impact Federal Administrative Behavior: 3 (Routledge Studies in North American Politics)
Brand: Routledge
Price: 84.53 GBP
Availability: InStock

International

Price History & Forecast

Last 89 days • 89 data points

Historical

Generating forecast...

Price Distribution

Price distribution over 89 days • 9 price levels

Days at Price

Current Price

Price Analysis

Most common price: £94 (16 days, 18.0%)

Price range: £82 - £98

Price levels: 9 different prices over 89 days

Description

Product Description What impact do federal courts have on the administrative agencies of the federal government? How do agencies react to the decisions of federal courts? This book answers these questions by examining the responses of federal agencies to the U.S. Courts of Appeals, revealing what happens inside agencies after courts rule against them. Robert J. Hume draws upon dozens of interviews with current and former administrators, taking readers behind the scenes of these organizations to reveal their internal procedures, their attitudes about courts, and their surprising capacity to be influenced by a judge’s choice of words. This fascinating study will be of interest to students and scholars of politics as well as those seeking great understanding of the intricacies of the US political system. Review Winner of the 2010 Alpha Sigma Nu Book Award "Hume asks an interesting and important question―how courts impact administrative agencies―and marshal’s impressive evidence to illuminate the process from court decision to administrative response. In short, not only do judicial outcomes matter, i.e. who wins and who loses, but more importantly the content of those decisions―the words―matter in determining how agencies respond. Highly recommended." - Artemus Ward, Northern Illinois University "An important contribution to the study of bureaucratic-judicial interactions. Hume combines both qualitative and quantitative methodologies to great effect in examining how federal bureaucracies respond to unfavorable decisions rendered by the U.S. Courts of Appeals – the de facto courts of last resort in the federal system. The author convincingly demonstrates that, while bureaucracies are driven by their policy preferences, they also show great deference to court decisions. Written in a vibrant manner, this book illustrates that agencies are best viewed as both self-interested actors and as networks of professionals who occasionally set aside politics in an effort to serve the public interest. - Paul M. Collins, Jr., University of North Texas, author of Friends of the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making "This book brings to bear rigorous evidence in the investigation of an important question that has implications for judicial legitimacy, administrative compliance, and the separation of powers. Though the approach is rigorous, the author makes sure it is also accessible to both a scholarly and lay audience. In sum, it is a terrific book that is sure to inform and engage." - Wendy L. Martinek, Department of Political Science, Binghamton University About the Author Robert J. Hume is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Fordham University. He has published in the Law & Society Review, the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, and Justice System Journal.

Product Specifications

Brand: Routledge
Format: hardcover
ASIN: 0415999278
Category: Books > Subjects > Business, Finance & Law > Law > International
Domain: Amazon UK
Release Date: 22 April 2009
Listed Since: 29 September 2008

Barcode

No barcode data available

Routledge How Courts Impact Federal Administrative Behavior: 3 (Routledge Studies in North American Politics)

Price History & Forecast

Price Distribution

Price Analysis

Description

Product Specifications

Barcode

Similar Products You Might Like

Comparative Judicial Review and Public Policy: 306 (Contributions in Political Science)

Justices, Presidents and Senators: A History of Us Supreme Court Appointments from Washington to Clinton

The Solicitor General and the United States Supreme Court: Executive Branch Influence and Judicial Decisions

Judicial Review and Contemporary Democratic Theory: Power, Domination, and the Courts (Law, Courts and Politics)

European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2019: Judicial Power: Safeguards and Limits in a Democratic Society: 1

The Judicial Function: Fundamental Principles of Contemporary Judging

Judicial Review Handbook

The Legitimacy of Highest Courts' Rulings - T.M.C. Asser Press

Routledge - The Supreme Court in a Separation of Powers System

Judicial Individuality on the UK Supreme Court (Hart Studies on Judging and the Courts)

Judicial Individuality on the UK Supreme Court (Hart Studies on Judging and the Courts)

Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior (Routledge Handbooks)

Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations

Routledge Law and Politics of Constitutional Courts in Indonesia

Law, Women Judges and the Gender Order: Lessons from the High Court of Australia

The State and Federal Courts: A Complete Guide to History, Powers, and Controversy

The Role of the Highest Courts of the United States of America and South Africa, and the European Court of Justice in Foreign Affairs

Routledge - Judicialization of Politics in Pakistan Study

Selected Cases from the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China: Volume 2 (Library of Selected Cases from the Chinese Court)

History of the Supreme Court of the United States (Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States)

The Rights Paradox: How Group Attitudes Shape US Supreme Court Legitimacy

Springer - Judicial Activism and the Democratic Rule of Law

National Courts and EU Law: New Issues, Theories and Methods (Judicial Review and Cooperation series)

Judicial Politics in the United States